A Garbage Piece of Gaming History is Up For Auction

This website might earn affiliate commissions from the hyperlinks on this web page. Terms of use.

Image by Robrady Design
Heritage Auctions has introduced that it’s going to public sale a real piece of gaming historical past — albeit a scammy, non-functional piece that wasn’t price cash even when it was new. What we now have right here, of us, is a real Infinium Labs Phantom, which is basically a pretend gaming console prototype. Put otherwise, Heritage Auctions is promoting a real prototype for what amounted to a rip-off product, and the corporate’s revealed description of the {hardware} should be laughed off the web.

According to Heritage Auctions:

Unfortunately, regardless of their finest efforts, the small firm couldn’t get the system off the bottom. Funding for the system’s growth turned an issue, forcing Infinium Labs to delay its launch frequently. Legal points and controversies surrounded the system, additional complicating issues…

Despite the general public destruction of the Phantom in 2004 and its string of controversies, Infinium labs wouldn’t give up… For 2003, it was an idea that was forward of its time.

This is some Grade A Revisionist Horseshi History proper right here.

Infinium Labs was uncovered as a probable rip-off in a 2003 investigation by [H]ardOCP, not lengthy after it broke cowl. The firm had no headquarters or workplace at its claimed bodily location, and its preliminary product demonstrations had been based mostly on non-functional dummy techniques. Its founder and CEO, Timothy Roberts, had already been accused of defrauding a number of traders via a doubtful string of startups. Timothy Roberts is at present serving a six-year jail sentence after being found guilty of defrauding investors in varied methods.

The Phantom Gaming Console. Image by Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 2.0

Infinium Labs’ sued [H]ardOCP for its protection, claiming the factual reporting amounted to successful piece meant to scare off traders. Infinium Labs misplaced. It was finally compelled to open its books and element the way it misplaced over $60 million {dollars}, with simply $3.5 million spent on development costs. The motive Infinium Labs “wouldn’t give up”, to borrow the public sale website’s parlance, is as a result of it’s inconceivable to give up one thing that was by no means began within the first place.

The Phantom Gaming Console was supposed to supply then-current {hardware} from AMD and Nvidia at a pretty worth (between $300 – $500). Alternately, clients had been supposed to have the ability to get the console at no cost supplied they signed up for a two-year subscription at $29.95 per 30 days (roughly $40 as we speak). There would supposedly be a free library of video games out there with different video games out there for buy. The solely factor standing between Phantom and its clients was the corporate’s full lack of publishing offers, servers, community infrastructure, and experience.

Remember, this was again in 2003. There was no Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, or Google cloud service. There  was no hyperscale datacenter supplier standing by with high-speed networking connections and empty server racks simply ready to be crammed with no matter high-end gaming service Infinium Labs noticed match to bestow upon the world. Any firm that wished to construct this type of service needed to do it themselves, from scratch.

The concept that Infinium was going to roll out a devoted server community to distribute video games over the web was ludicrous at the time. The options that Phantom was claiming in 2003 had been so new, they weren’t options in any respect. For instance, it was a console with out a disc drive at a time when solely a handful of folks had broadband quick sufficient to assist such a mannequin. Declaring that solely broadband customers might benefit from the platform wasn’t revolutionary, it was a a foul enterprise choice. Another pink flag; the person who based the corporate had a sketchy previous, and is at present serving time for investor fraud. The nail within the coffin was no publishers or builders had been prepared to associate with Infinium, and the corporate by no means had a believable plan for long-term success.

What Infinium was promising in 2003 didn’t come throughout as new or cutting-edge. It appeared like rip-off artistry from an organization with no companions and no product. The undeniable fact that Infinium Labs threatened my onetime employer over the story I wrote again in 2004 and compelled us to take away a bit of pre-rendered artwork emphasised that this was an organization with completely nothing to again up its claims.

I’m not making an attempt to say the prototype is nugatory. Rare {hardware} tends to be standard and the thought of proudly owning a uncommon rip-off product dreamed up by a convicted felon appeals to some folks. Heck, even Martin Shkreli had a fan.

But the Phantom wasn’t “forward of its time.” We had the web in 2003 even when downloading complete video games from it wasn’t quite common. It was already clear in 2003 that PC video games had been quickly transferring to on-line distribution. Hard drives existed. The web existed. It didn’t take a genius to think about that we would someday have sufficient bandwidth that we might obtain video games to inside storage as a substitute of loading them from discs.

The concept that one thing is “forward of its time” implies that it supplied some function or functionality that might later go on to turn into customary, even when the product itself isn’t profitable. Vaporware that by no means shipped, “launched” by an organization that by no means had an opportunity in hell of transport it doesn’t depend.

*No insult meant to Robrady Design, the corporate that constructed the Phantom’s chassis. The chassis seems to have been the one “actual” factor concerning the platform.

Now Read:


Related Posts